Francis KendallAge: 881620–1708
- Name
- Francis Kendall
| Birth | 1620 40 36 |
| Death of a paternal grandfather | John Kendall 1628 (Age 8) |
| Marriage | View this family October 24, 1644 (Age 24) |
| Death of a mother | Elizabeth Sacherell after 1645 (Age 25) |
| Death of a father | John Kendall March 21, 1659 (Age 39) |
| Death of a brother | Thomas Kendall July 22, 1681 (Age 61) |
| Death of a sister | Mabel Kendall June 15, 1690 (Age 70) |
| Occupation | Corn Mill Owner and Farmer |
| Death | May 31, 1708 (Age 88) |
| Family with parents |
| father |
John Kendall Birth: between March 21, 1579 and 1580 31 26 — Norfolk, Norfolk, England Death: March 21, 1659 — Cambridge, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA |
| mother |
Elizabeth Sacherell Birth: 1584 — Cambridge, Suffolk, England Death: after 1645 — Cambridge, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA |
|
Marriage: November 25, 1605 — Cambridge, Suffolk, England |
|
|
1 month elder sister |
Mabel Kendall Birth: 1605 25 21 — Cambridge, Suffolk, England Death: June 15, 1690 — Woburn, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA |
|
12 years elder brother |
Thomas Kendall Birth: 1616 36 32 — Cambridge, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA Death: July 22, 1681 — Reading, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA |
|
5 years himself |
Francis Kendall Birth: 1620 40 36 — Cambridge, Suffolk, England Death: May 31, 1708 — Woburn, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA |
| Francis Kendall + … … |
| himself |
Francis Kendall Birth: 1620 40 36 — Cambridge, Suffolk, England Death: May 31, 1708 — Woburn, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA |
|
Marriage: October 24, 1644 — Woburn, Middlesex, Massachusetts, USA |
| Note | shows two conflicting dates deriving from two sources. I believe Baily may be wrong. My hypothesis is that the original source shows the date as being the 24th day of the tenth month of 1644. Since England and its colonies did not convert to the Julian calendar until the mid-eigtheenth century, the new year did not begin until March. Hence December was still the tenth month in 1644. A more recent researcher may have just counted out ten and got to October (which as you no doubt know - was the eighth month in the 1600s). shows two conflicting dates deriving from two sources. I believe Baily may be wrong. My hypothesis is that the original source shows the date as being the 24th day of the tenth month of 1644. Since England and its colonies did not convert to the Julian calendar until the mid-eigtheenth century, the new year did not begin until March. Hence December was still the tenth month in 1644. A more recent researcher may have just counted out ten and got to October (which as you no doubt know - was the eighth month in the 1600s). |